Refine your search
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sarkar, Arindam
- Comparison between Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine alone among Patients undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries under Sub Arachnoid Block
Abstract Views :369 |
PDF Views:96
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, IN
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, IN
Source
Central Journal of ISA, Vol 1, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 64-71Abstract
Background and Aims: Postoperative pain management is one of the key issues among patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under subarachnoid block. We decided to study the effect of intrathecal addition of 25 μg fentanyl to 0.5% bupivacaine in terms of quality of blocks and post-operative analgesia. Methods: A total of 80 ASA Grade I/II patients aged >18 years were enrolled in the study and were randomized to two groups: Group I (n=40) received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (3ml) with fentanyl 25 μg (0.5 ml) intrathecally whereas Group II (n=40) received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (3ml) diluted with 0.5 ml Normal Saline only. Hemodynamics, sensory block level, onset time and duration of motor/sensory block, adverse effects and Time for first rescue analgesic were noted. Data was compared using SPSS 21.0. Results: Both the groups were comparable demographically and for baseline hemodynamic parameters. No hemodynamic event took place in either of two groups. Median block level achieved was higher in Group I (T6) as compared to Group II (T8) (p<0.001). No significant difference between two groups was observed with respect to mean time taken for onset of sensory and motor blocks (p>0.05). However, mean duration of sensory and motor block was longer in Group I (229.50±56.16 and 163.38±35.15 min) as compared to that in Group II (158.50±50.93 and 116.05±37.66 min) (p<0.001). Time taken to first request for postoperative analgesia was also longer in Group I (288.0±90.37 min) as compared to that in Group II (196.25±59.21 min) (p<0.001). No significant difference in adverse effects was observed (p>0.05). Conclusion: Intrathecal adjuvant use of fentanyl potentiated the post-operative analgesic effect and prolong sensory blockade without affecting motor block.Keywords
Bupivacaine, Fentanyl, Intrathecal, Lower Abdominal Surgery, Subarachnoid Block.References
- Elia N, Culebras X, Mazza C, Schiffer E, Tramèr MR. Clonidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal local anesthetics for surgery: Systematic review of randomized trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008; 33:159–67 https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.10.008 PMid:18299097.
- Boussofara M, Carlès M, Raucoules-Aimé M, Sellam MR, Horn JL. Effects of intrathecal midazolam on postoperative analgesia when added to a bupivacaine-clonidine mixture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006; 31:501–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200611000-00005 PMid:17138191.
- Seewal R, Shende D, Kashyap L, Mohan V. Effect of addition of various doses of fentanyl intrathecally to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine on perioperative analgesia and subarachnoid-block characteristics in lower abdominal surgery: A doseresponse study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007; 32(1): 20–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2006.09.007 PMid:17196488.
- Chattopadhyay A, Maitra S, Sen S, Bhattacharjee S, Layek A, Pal S, Ghosh K. A study to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine alone with intrathecal bupivacaine midazolam combination in patients undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2013; 2013:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/567134 PMid:23762043 PMCid:PMC3671234.
- Boussofara M, Carlès M, Raucoules-Aimé M, Sellam MR, Horn JL. Effects of intrathecal midazolam on postoperative analgesia when added to a bupivacaine-clonidine mixture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006; 31:501–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200611000-00005 PMid:17138191.
- Elia N, Culebras X, Mazza C, Schiffer E, Tramèr MR. Clonidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal local anesthetics for surgery: Systematic review of randomized trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008; 33:159–67. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.10.008 PMid:18299097.
- Shukla D, Verma A, Agarwal A, Pandey HD, Tyagi C. Comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine with intrathecal magnesium sulfate used as adjuvants to bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct-Dec; 27(4):495–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.86594 PMid:22096283 PMCid:PMC3214555.
- Hunt CO, Naulty JS, Bader AM, Hauch MA, Vartikar JV, Datta S, et al. Perioperative analgesia with subarachnoid fentanyl-bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 1989; 71:535–40. https://doi. org/10.1097/00000542-198910000-00009 PMid:2679237.
- Ben David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacainefentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2000; 25(3):235–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1098-7339(00)90004-X PMid:10834776.
- Prakash S, Joshi N, Gogia AR, Prakash S, Singh R. Analgesic efficacy of two doses of intrathecal midazolam with bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006; 31:221–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200605000-00008 PMid:16701187.
- Korhonen AM, Valanne JV, Jokela RM, Ravaska P, Korttila K. Ondansetron does not prevent pruritus induced by low-dose intrathecalfentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2003; 47(10):1292–7. https:// doi.org/10.1046/j.1399-6576.2003.00206.x PMid:14616330.
- Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42(10):891–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011037 PMid:8706199.
- Gupta R, Verma R, Bogra J, Kohli M, Raman R, Kushwaha JK. A Comparative study of intrathecaldexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to Bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul-Sep; 27(3):339–43. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.83678 PMid:21897504 PMCid:PMC3161458.
- Mahendru V, Tewari A, Katyal S, Grewal A, Singh MR, Katyal R. A comparison of intrathecaldexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 29:496– 502. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.119151 PMid:24249987 PMCid: PMC3819844.
- Motiani P, Chaudhary S, Bahl N, Sethi AK. Intrathecal Sufentanil Versus Fentanyl for Lower Limb Surgeries- A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology. 2010; 26(4):507– 13. PMid:21547180 PMCid:PMC3087250.
- Mehta S, Dalwadi H, Shah TD. Comparative study of low dose bupivacainefentanyl Vs. conventional dose of bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for orthopedic procedures in elderly patients. Guj Med J. 2015; 70(1):25–8.
- Atallah MM, Shorrab AA, Abdel Mageed YM, Demian AD. Lowdose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: The suitability and impact of adding intrathecal fentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006; 50:798–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13996576.2006.01063.x PMid:16879461.
- Sawhney KY, Kundra S, Grewal A, Katyal S, Singh G, Kaur A. A randomized double blinded comparison of epidural infusion of bupivacaine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine-fentanyl, ropivacaine-fentanyl for postoperative pain relief in lower limb surgeries. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015; 9:UC19–UC23. https://doi.org/10.7860/ JCDR/2015/15157.6459.
- Shah S, Shah B, Deb C. A study of comparative evaluation of bupivacaine plain versus bupivacaine with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia in geriatric patients. International Journal of Medical and Health Research. 2016; 2(6):23–6.
- Jain G, Singh DK, Bansal P, Ahmed B, Dhama SS. Comparison of low doses of intrathecal bupivacaine in combined spinal epidural anaesthesia with epidural volume extension for caesarean delivery. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches. 2012; 6(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.4103/02591162.103373 PMid:25885502 PMCid:PMC4173441.
- Akanmu ON, Soyannwo OA, Sotunmbi PT, Lawani-Osunde AS, Desalu I, Adekola OO, Oridola SE. Analgesic effects of intrathecally administered fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013; 6(3):255–60.
- Routray SS, Ravi K, Mishra D. Effect of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine for orthopaedic lower limb and lower abdominal procedures: A double blind control study. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia. 2015; 2(4):204–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-4994.2015.00030.X
- Chandak AA, Thaker JA, Kapdi MS. A comparative study of bupivacaine, bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery. IJSR. 2013; 2(6):422–4.
- Jaiswal VS, Thakare DW. Comparison of unilateral spinal anaesthesia using low dose bupivacaine with or without fentanyl in lower limb surgery. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 5(5):1752–8. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20163046.
- Nayagam HA, Singh NR, Singh HS. A prospective randomised double blind study of intrathecal fentanyl and dexmedetomidine added to low dose bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for lower abdominal surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Jul-Aug; 58(4):430–5. https:// doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.138979 PMid:25197111 PMCid:PMC4155288.
- Tarbeeh GA, Mohamed AA. Effects of intrathecal bupivacaine–fentanyl versus bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine in diabetic surgical patients. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013; 29(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2012.08.008.
- Public Libraries and Community Information Services: An Experience in Blocks of Sundarban Region, South 24 Parganas
Abstract Views :273 |
PDF Views:13
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 56, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 32-35Abstract
Public libraries are called people’s university. The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between public library and Community Information Services (CIS) in various blocks of Sundarban region, of South 24 Parganas district. Community Information Services is one through which a public library provides community information to members of the community it serves. This paper also discusses Community Library cum Information Centres (CLICs). Examining the librarians’ as well as users’ perspectives, an effort has been made to offer some suggestions.Keywords
Community Information Service, Community Library cum Information Centres (CLICs), Public Libraries, West Bengal.References
- Gilbert, K. (2015). A survey of user’s satisfaction with public library services in Mubi, Adamawa State. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(8), 52-57, Retrieved from www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol20-issue8/Version-3/H020835257.pdf
- Library Association (1980). Community Information: What libraries can Do: A Consultative Document. London: The Library Association. Working Party on Community Information, The University of Michigan; 135p. ISBN: 0853658722, 9780853658726. https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Community_Information.html?id=MN-7gAAAAMAAJ& redir_esc=y.
- Majumder, K.P. (2016). Community information services through public libraries and information centres: An experience in West Bengal, India. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 5:797-804, Retrieved from www.qqml.net/papers/...2016.../544QQML_Journal_2016_Majumder_797-804.pdf
- Ramaiah, L.S. and Sankara Reddy, M. (2010). Position and status of public libraries in India: A critical study. In: L.S. Ramaiah et al. (Eds.), National conference on public libraries in the knowledge societies, Vijayawada: APLA: p. 9-19.
- Social Cataloguing Sites:Features and Comparison in Relation to ISBD
Abstract Views :295 |
PDF Views:7
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 56, No 5 (2019), Pagination: 257-260Abstract
In the past few years, the number of social site related applications has increased; and also, these are playing an important role in the collection and sharing of knowledge. These types of application give users the freedom to create vocabulary, which helps to describe and categorize online resources. The social cataloguing applications are a type of web application that helps users to catalogue various items. These social cataloguing sites help users to catalogue their personal book collections, and make the collection known to all users with similar tastes. This study analyzed and evaluated the bibliographic and social features of some selected popular social cataloguing sites and also compared with the data elements prescribed in the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD).Keywords
International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), Online Resources, Social Cataloguing.References
- Cavanaugh, T.W. (2007). Online Personal Book Cataloging. Florida Reading Quarterly, 44(2), Retrieved from http:// www.flreads.org/Publications/quarterly/samples/online_book_catalog.htm.
- Farrell, S. & Lau, T. (2006). Fringe Contacts: People-Tagging for the Enterprise. Workshop on Collaborative Web Tagging, WWW 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 22, 2006. Retrieved from http://tlau.org/research/papers/www06-tagging-fc.pdf.
- Giustini, D., Hooker, D. & Cho, A. (2009). Social cataloguing: An overview for health librarians. JCHLA/JABSC, 30, 133-38. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/19693267/Social_cataloguing_an_overview_for_health_librarians, https://doi.org/10.5596/c09-039.
- Spiteri, L.F. (2009). Social cataloguing sites: Features and implications for cataloguing practice and the public library catalogue. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 47(1), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802451991.
- Spiteri, L.F. & Laurel T. (2011). The Public Library Catalogue as a Social Space: A Case Study of Social Discovery Systems in Two Canadian Public Libraries. 2010 OCLC/ALISE Research Grant Report Published Electronically by OCLC Research. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/grants/reports/2010/spiteri2010.pdf.
- Social Tags Versus Controlled Vocabularies: A Comparative Metadata Analysis
Abstract Views :263 |
PDF Views:11
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Jadavpur, Kolkata - 700032, West Bengal, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Jadavpur, Kolkata - 700032, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 57, No 5 (2020), Pagination: 259-264Abstract
With the advent of technology, the tagging has gained popularity. Many researchers believe that social tags, #hashtag may increase the use of library collections. The present study examines the similarities and differences between the Library of Congress’s Subject Headings (LCSH) descriptors and social tags. The study also sought to know whether social tags can be implemented in the library’s database or not. This paper focuses on the comparison between social tags collected from social cataloguing site Library Thing and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) descriptors collected from Library of Congress online catalogue. For this study more than a hundred book titles in the domain of philosophy were collected from the two selected databases. The results suggest that if the social tags are more subjects oriented, it could improve the subject access to books in libraries; but it cannot substitute the controlled vocabulary like Library of Congress Subject Headings.Keywords
Controlled Vocabulary, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), Library Thing, Social Tagging, Social Tags, Spearman’s Correlation.References
- Bogers, T. and Petras, V. (2017). Supporting book search: A comprehensive comparison of tags vs. controlled vocabulary metadata. Data and Information Management, 1(1): 17–34.
- Chowdhury, G. G. and Chowdhury, S. (2003). Introduction to digital libraries. London: Facet Publishing.
- Lee, D. H. and Schleyer, T. (2010). A Comparison of MeSH Terms and CiteULike Social Tags as Metadata for the Same Items. In: IHI ‘10: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM, New York, NY, USA; p. 445-48.
- Library of Congress (2020). Library of Congress. Retrieved April 26, 2020. https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/ searchKeyword?editSearchId=33598.
- Library Thing (2020). Library Thing. Retrieved April 24, 2020. https://www.librarything.com/.
- Lu, C., Park, J.-R. and Hu, X. (2010). User tags versus expert assigned subject terms: A comparison of Library Thing Tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science, 36(6): 763-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510386173.
- Metadata (n.d.). Metadata. Retrieved May 2, 2020, from https://techterms.com/definition/metadata, https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/metadata.
- Samanta, K. S. and Rath, D. S. (2019). Social tags versus LCSH descriptors: A comparative metadata analysis in the Field of Economics. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34(4): 145-51.
- Stephanie (2016). Statistics How To. Retrieved April 29, 2020. https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/jaccard-index/.
- Use of Social Media for Effective Library and Information Services among University Students: A Study
Abstract Views :245 |
PDF Views:7
Authors
Arijit Das
1,
Arindam Sarkar
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700054, West Bengal, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700054, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 58, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 101-107Abstract
Information communication technology (ICT) plays a key role in the transmission of information between each other. Social networking sites are good examples of a network of communication and it is a good social structural way that allows the user to interact and work with other users. WhatsApp and Facebook are two very popular social media that very much help users to interact each other via text, image, audio, video messaging. This paper was based on a survey that measured the usability of Facebook and WhatsApp for service delivery to the library. An online questionnaire was used to collect information from the respondents. The findings indicated that respondents showed a positive attitude towards the services of library through Facebook and WhatsApp.Keywords
Facebook, Information Communication Technology, Library Services, Social Networking Sites, WhatsAppReferences
- Ansari, M. S. and Tripathi, A. (2017). Use of WhatsApp for effective delivery of library and information services. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information, 37(5), 360-365. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.37.5.11090.
- Dadzie, P. S. (2007). Information literacy: Assessing the readiness of Ghanaian Universities. Information Development, 23(4), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666907084762.
- Facebook (2019). Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook.
- Lifewire (2019). Retrieved from: https://www.lifewire.com/what-is-facebook-3486391.
- Smart phones (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone.
- WhatsApp (2019). Retrieved from: https://www.whatsapp.com/about/.
- Power of a Meromorphic Function Sharing A Set with Least Cardinality and Weight with its Derivative
Abstract Views :379 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishnagar Women's College, Department of Mathematics, Krishnagar, IN
1 Krishnagar Women's College, Department of Mathematics, Krishnagar, IN
Source
The Journal of the Indian Mathematical Society, Vol 88, No 3-4 (2021), Pagination: 355–372Abstract
In this paper we deal with the uniqueness problem of the power of a meromorphic function when it shares a set with its derivative. We also relax the nature of sharing of the set and reduce the cardinality of the shared set in some cases.Keywords
Meromorphic function, derivatives, uniqueness, set sharingReferences
- A. Banerjee, On the uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two sets, Comm. Math. Anal., 10.(10)(2010), 1-10.
- A. Banerjee and B. Chakraborty, On the uniqueness of power of a meromorphic function sharing a set with its k-th derivative, J. Indian Math. Soc., 85(1-2). (2018), 1-15.
- F. Gross, Factorization of meromorphic functions and some open problems, Proc. Conf. Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, Ky(1976) Lecture Notes in Math., Springer(Berlin), 599 (1977), 51-69.
- W. K. Hayman, Meromorphic Functions, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964.
- I. Lahiri, Weighted sharing and uniqueness of meromorphic functions, Nagoya Math. J., 161 (2001), 193-206.
- I. Lahiri and S. Dewan, Value distribution of the product of a meromorphic function and its derivative, Kodai Math. J., 26.(2003), 95-100.
- I. Laine, Nevanlinna Theory and Complex Di erential Equations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993.
- X. M. Li and H. X. Yi, Some results on the regular solutions of a linear differential equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 2210-2221.
- A. Z. Mohon'ko, On the Nevanlinna Characteristics of some meromorphic functions, Theory of Funct. Funct. Anal. Appl., 14 (1971), 83-87.
- L. A. Rubel and C. C. Yang, Values shared by entire function and its derivative, Complex Analysis (Proc. Conf., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, Ky., 1976), 599 (1977), 101-103.
- G. Valiron, Lectures on the General Theory of Integral Functions, Edouarard Privat., Toulouse, 1923.
- C. C. Yang and H. X. Yi, Uniqueness theory of meromorphic functions, Science Press/ Kluwer Acad. Pub., 2003.
- L. Z. Yang and J. L. Zhang, Non-existance of meromorphic solutions of Fermat type functional equation, Aequations Math., 76 (2008), 140-150.
- H. X. Yi, Meromorphic functions that share one or two values II, Kodai Math. J., 22 (1999), 264-272.
- J. L. Zhang, Meromorphic functions sharing a small function with their derivatives, Kyungpook Math. J., 19 (2009), 143-154.
- MeSH versus BibSonomy: A Comparative Study of Index Terms and Social Tags in Nursing Literature
Abstract Views :232 |
PDF Views:5
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Liver and Digestive Sciences, Kolkata – 700150, West Bengal, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, IN
1 Indian Institute of Liver and Digestive Sciences, Kolkata – 700150, West Bengal, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 58, No 6 (2021), Pagination: 377-384Abstract
Present study attempts to examine similarities and differences between the expert generated subject headings and social tags. The study focuses on the comparing BibSonomy social tags and MeSH terms. For this purpose hundred articles in the domain of nursing were collected from BibSonomy as well as PuMed. The results show that 92.72% MeSH terms are not available in social tag vocabulary and almost 15% social tags are likely to be accepted by MeSH terms i.e., experts. Jaccard similarity coefficient shows that users and experts use variant terminology. Users use mostly title-based keywords while experts have used mostly topic-based terminologies. It is suggested that while social tags could improve document retrieval. They cannot substitute controlled vocabulary. OPACs must allow users to describe library documents through user-generated social tags along with expert (librarian) generated terms.Keywords
BibSonomy, Controlled Vocabulary, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), Social Tag, Spearman's Correlation.References
- BibSonomy (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bibsonomy.org/.
- Chowdhury, G. G. and Chowdhury, S. (2003). Introduction to Digital Libraries. London: Facet Publishing; p. 182-183.
- Lee, D. H. (2015). Comparative analysis of index terms and social tags: Medical subject headings vs. BibSonomy and Delicious. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(2): 291-311. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.291.
- Lee, D. H. and Schleyer, T. (2010) A Comparison of MeSH Terms and CiteULike Social Tags as Metadata for the same Items. In: IHI ‘10: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. New York, NY, USA; p. 445-448.
- Maalim, A. D. (2006). Participatory rural appraisal techniques in disenfranchised communities: A Kenyan case study. International Nursing Review, 53(3): 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00489.x.
- NLM Catalog (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/.
- PubMed (n.d.). Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
- Sarkar, A. and Bhattacharya, U. (2020). Social tags versus controlled vocabularies: A comparative metadata analysis. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 57(5): 259-264.